When bubbles burst, some win, some lose

When a housing bubble bursts, two things separate winners from losers: timing and the debt level.

Timing matters because the losers are those who end up selling their homes after values fall and before prices rebound. The winners wait longer and keep their homes until values recover. Whether they feel like winners is another matter: Some people end up financially trapped in their homes, wishing they could move, but unable to afford to.  

The easy way
The surest protection from a housing bubble is to buy a home while prices are rising, long before the bubble bursts (in other words, to have good timing), and to make a substantial down payment and avoid borrowing against equity (so you don't go too deeply into debt compared to the home's price). In such a case the home often can be sold for a gain, even after values collapse, because the rise was bigger than the fall.

Timing is partly out of your control because you can't dictate when prices collapse. Timing is partly under your control, though, because you can elect not to buy a house, if you think you would own it for only a couple of years.

While timing isn't fully under your control, you can manage your indebtedness. Imagine debt as water that's flooding your neighborhood. If you make a 20-percent down payment when you buy the house, the water is just below the eaves. In case of emergency, you can scramble onto the roof. But then you get a home equity loan worth another 10 percent of the purchase price. Now only the top of the roof is above the water. In an emergency you'll sit on the roof's peak as water laps at your toes.

The hard way
Now imagine the house sinking into the ground. That's a metaphor for a drop in the home's value. Let's say the value drops 20 percent below the purchase price. The entire house is underwater -- even the top of the roof where you had been sitting. You owe more than the house is worth. You'll have to tread water until the value rises again or you can pay down some of the debt. If you're forced to sell the house while it's underwater, the buyer will give you less than you owe the bank. You'll have to find the money somewhere or else suffer a big hit to your credit record.

One way to avoid the pain of a burst housing bubble is to make a substantial down payment. If you put 20 percent down and the value has dropped 10 percent by the time you sell it, you'll sell the house at a loss. Bad luck, but your out-of-pocket expense, even after paying a real-estate commission, will be minimal or nonexistent. In fact, you might end up with a few bucks in cash after you sell the house, retire the mortgage and pay commissions. (This is assuming that you don't take out a home equity loan.)

On the other hand, if you put 5 percent down and have to sell the home after it has lost 10 percent of its original value, you'll have to come up with cash to satisfy the mortgage and pay any real-estate commissions. Failure to pay off the mortgage in full could result in a messed-up credit record for years.

-- Posted: Aug. 25, 2005

 

 

 
Money Matters
Bankrate.com

Jumbo loans

Dear Money Matters,
What is considered a jumbo loan?
Lillian

Dear Lillian,
The name "jumbo" truly reflects the product. A jumbo loan is a mortgage with an amount that's larger than conventional loans. Current guidelines identify a jumbo loan as any mortgage with an amount larger than $359,600for a single-family home (Because jumbo loans exceed the boundaries of conventional loans, they are known as "nonconforming loans." This classification has an ominous ring to it, and, in some cases that connotation bears out. Nonconforming loans as a group are loan products that, for one reason or another, fail to follow traditional loan underwriting guidelines.

In some cases, a borrower may have prior credit problems or an unusually high debt level. In the case of a jumbo loan, however, the focus is on the size of the loan itself -- given that it's larger than the usual amount, lenders treat a jumbo loan with a greater consideration of risk than they would conventional loans.

That can also mean different sorts of underwriting requirements for jumbo loans. In some cases -- for particularly expensive pieces of property -- a lender may require two appraisals to ensure that the value is, indeed, accurate. Moreover, applicants for jumbo loans may also have to endure more-exhaustive investigations into their finances, including income, debt level and other elements that may affect their ability to pay back an unusually large loan.

Another reason jumbos are considered riskier is that there's a smaller market for the homes they secure. While conventionally priced houses attract a broad range of potential buyers, not as many can afford homes in the $300,000-plus range. That can add an extra element of risk. If somebody takes out a jumbo loan and proves unable to meet the payments, it may be far more difficult to sell the home and pay off the loan -- which makes lenders jittery.

Not surprisingly, that translates into higher interest costs. The most recent figures I saw for the average for 30-year jumbo mortgages put them at roughly two-tenths of a percentage point greater than a conventional 30-year product.

-- Posted: May 31, 2002