|
When bubbles burst, some win, some
lose
By
Holden Lewis •
Bankrate.com
When a housing bubble bursts,
two things separate winners from losers: timing and the debt
level.
Timing matters because the losers are
those who end up selling their homes after values fall and
before prices rebound. The winners wait longer and keep their
homes until values recover. Whether they feel like winners is
another matter: Some people end up financially trapped in
their homes, wishing they could move, but unable to afford
to.
The easy
way The surest protection from a housing bubble is
to buy a home while prices are rising, long before the bubble
bursts (in other words, to have good timing), and to make a
substantial down payment and avoid borrowing against equity
(so you don't go too deeply into debt compared to the home's
price). In such a case the home often can be sold for a gain,
even after values collapse, because the rise was bigger than
the fall.
Timing is partly out of your control because you
can't dictate when prices collapse. Timing is partly under
your control, though, because you can elect not to buy a
house, if you think you would own it for only a couple of
years.
While timing isn't fully under your control, you
can manage your indebtedness. Imagine debt as water that's
flooding your neighborhood. If you make a 20-percent down
payment when you buy the house, the water is just below the
eaves. In case of emergency, you can scramble onto the roof.
But then you get a home equity loan worth another 10 percent
of the purchase price. Now only the top of the roof is above
the water. In an emergency you'll sit on the roof's peak as
water laps at your toes.
The hard
way Now imagine the house sinking into the ground.
That's a metaphor for a drop in the home's value. Let's say
the value drops 20 percent below the purchase price. The
entire house is underwater -- even the top of the roof where
you had been sitting. You owe more than the house is worth.
You'll have to tread water until the value rises again or you
can pay down some of the debt. If you're forced to sell the
house while it's underwater, the buyer will give you less than
you owe the bank. You'll have to find the money somewhere or
else suffer a big hit to your credit record.
One way to avoid the pain of a burst housing
bubble is to make a substantial down payment. If you put 20
percent down and the value has dropped 10 percent by the time
you sell it, you'll sell the house at a loss. Bad luck, but
your out-of-pocket expense, even after paying a real-estate
commission, will be minimal or nonexistent. In fact, you might
end up with a few bucks in cash after you sell the house,
retire the mortgage and pay commissions. (This is assuming
that you don't take out a home equity
loan.)
On the other hand, if you put 5 percent down and
have to sell the home after it has lost 10 percent of its
original value, you'll have to come up with cash to satisfy
the mortgage and pay any real-estate commissions. Failure to
pay off the mortgage in full could result in a messed-up
credit record for years. |
|
|
| |
|
Jumbo loans
Dear Money Matters, What is considered a jumbo loan?
Lillian
Dear Lillian, The name "jumbo" truly
reflects the product. A jumbo loan is a mortgage with an amount
that's larger than conventional loans. Current guidelines identify a
jumbo loan as any mortgage with an amount larger than $359,600for a
single-family home (Because jumbo loans exceed the boundaries of
conventional loans, they are known as "nonconforming loans." This
classification has an ominous ring to it, and, in some cases that
connotation bears out. Nonconforming loans as a group are loan
products that, for one reason or another, fail to follow traditional
loan underwriting guidelines.
In some cases, a borrower may have prior credit
problems or an unusually high debt level. In the case of a jumbo
loan, however, the focus is on the size of the loan itself -- given
that it's larger than the usual amount, lenders treat a jumbo loan
with a greater consideration of risk than they would conventional
loans.
That can also mean different sorts of underwriting
requirements for jumbo loans. In some cases -- for particularly
expensive pieces of property -- a lender may require two appraisals
to ensure that the value is, indeed, accurate. Moreover, applicants
for jumbo loans may also have to endure more-exhaustive
investigations into their finances, including income, debt level and
other elements that may affect their ability to pay back an
unusually large loan.
Another reason jumbos are considered riskier is that
there's a smaller market for the homes they secure. While
conventionally priced houses attract a broad range of potential
buyers, not as many can afford homes in the $300,000-plus range.
That can add an extra element of risk. If somebody takes out a jumbo
loan and proves unable to meet the payments, it may be far more
difficult to sell the home and pay off the loan -- which makes
lenders jittery.
Not surprisingly, that translates into higher interest
costs. The most recent figures I saw for the average for 30-year
jumbo mortgages put them at roughly two-tenths of a percentage point
greater than a conventional 30-year product.
-- Posted: May 31, 2002 | |